Regulatory · Financial institutions

Regulatory compliance engines for financial institutions.

AML, sanctions, MiFID II, DORA, SMCR — encoded as structured rules, evaluated in real time, evidenced at export. Examination-ready by construction.

Overview

Regulatory compliance engines infrastructure for financial institutions, built to the standard institutions in this sector are required to operate.

XVICA designs, builds, and operates this layer for financial institutions clients in the UK, US, Canada, and Australia. The work is specified against the regulatory regime, the operational profile, and the examination expectations of this sector before any code is written.

01Why it matters

What financial institutions cannot get wrong here.

  • Regulatory change arrives faster than implementation cycles.
  • Examination evidence requires the system's word, not the slide deck's.
  • Manual controls do not scale to contemporary transaction volumes.
  • A missed sanctions hit is a headline and a fine.
02Regulatory posture

Named regimes, mapped controls

Regulatory requirements are translated into explicit control requirements, then mapped to tests and evidence collection. Nothing is implied.

Financial crime

FCA FCG, JMLSG guidance, OFAC / OFSI sanctions, EU 6AMLD, FinCEN BSA/AML, and FINTRAC / AUSTRAC equivalents.

Conduct & market

FCA COBS/SYSC, MiFID II and MiFIR, EMIR, SMCR, and consumer duty evidence.

Operational & resilience

DORA, PS21/3, APRA CPS 230, OSFI E-21, and NYDFS Part 500.

03Reference architecture

Design decisions distinctive to this intersection

Components and design choices that recur across our work for this sector. Each deployment is specified individually.

Deterministic rule engine

Rules author in a reviewable DSL; every evaluation produces a signed, versioned decision record.

Versioned regulatory taxonomy

Rules grouped by regulation, jurisdiction, and effective date. Historical posture queryable at any date.

Case management, not ticket spam

Alerts feed into a workflow with documented disposition, SLA, and QA sampling. Closed alerts are evidence, not noise.

Model integration with SR 11-7 discipline

Where models inform rules, model inputs, versions, and outputs are captured end-to-end.

Examination pack on demand

Selectable date range, rule family, jurisdiction. Signed at export.

04XVICA's approach

How we work in financial institutions.

Regulatory compliance in a financial institution does not fail in engineering; it fails in evidence. The rule was applied; nobody can show it. The sanctions list was updated; nobody can prove it covered the transaction. We build the engine so that the evidence is a consequence of operation rather than a separate reporting project. Every rule evaluation is a signed record; every list update is versioned against the transactions that saw it; every alert disposition is a workflow with documented quality assurance. When an examiner asks a question, the answer is a query, not a project. The engagements that deliver this well also deliver the second-order benefit: compliance operations spends less time producing packs and more time working the cases that actually matter.

Regulatory compliance engines infrastructure for financial institutions.

Request a confidential briefing. We assess alignment and outline how XVICA can support your objectives in this sector.

Request a private briefing

All regulatory work·Financial institutions sector